Author Archives: Michael Korican

About Michael Korican

A long-time media artist, Michael’s filmmaking stretches back to 1978. Michael graduated from York University film school with Special Honours, winning the Famous Players Scholarship in his final year. The Rolling Stone Book of Rock Video called Michael's first feature 'Recorded: Live!' "the first film about rock video". Michael served on the board of L.I.F.T. when he lived in Toronto during the eighties and managed the Bloor Cinema for Tom and Jerry. He has been prolific over his past eight years in Victoria, having made over thirty-five shorts, won numerous awards, produced two works for BravoFACT! and received development funding for 'Begbie’s Ghost' through the CIFVF and BC Film.

The ticktokification of media and how to stop doomscrolling

Posted on by
Reply

Enrico Tartarotti of @enricotartarotti on Youtube asks the question: Short Form Content Is BROKEN. Can We Fix It?

Enrico believes, in his own words:

“TikTok, YouTube Shorts and Instagram Reels have taken over the internet and completely changed how we view content by spreading short form content and videos everywhere. But… they are already failing. Meanwhile, long form content is having a renaissance. There is a way to save our brains from frying off retention hacks and that is… joining forces.”

He presents his case in five chapters.

  • Part 1: Why everything became a copy of TikTok
  • Part 2: Attention spans and retention black holes
  • Part 3: The Problem — falling apart
  • Part 4: The other side
  • Part 5: The Solution — the missing link

His solution? Enrico proposes changes that will harness society’s doomscrolling dopamine addiction.

  1. Link long and short content in a meaningful way, so that shorts lead to more in-depth media
  2. Change what the algorithm optimizes for, to packages of both short and corresponding longer media
  3. Allow creators to build real businesses, so they can live meaningful lives and still contribute to society.

Well worth 15 minutes!

My take: Fascinating! I will admit to wasting hours of time scrolling through short form content and I detest the “endless scroll” design of modern media apps. I like that Enrico links the rise in short form content with the rise in the sheer number of videos, suggesting that this is merely a solution to discoverability.

How to piss off film festivals in 16 easy steps

Posted on by
Reply

Elliot Grove lists on Raindance the 16 Things Film Festivals Hate About Filmmakers.

Here are the points but please visit the site for the full elaboration:

  1. Filmmakers who don’t read the festival rules and regulations
  2. Filmmakers who don’t complete submission details
  3. Filmmakers who send wrong or incorrect email and telephone numbers
  4. Filmmakers who are incommunicado
  5. Filmmakers who are too communicative
  6. Filmmakers who are having fights with their team
  7. Filmmakers who haven’t cleared music rights
  8. Filmmakers who send faulty preview discs
  9. Filmmakers who want us to watch their films on DVD
  10. Filmmakers who send bad production stills
  11. Filmmakers with no social network
  12. Filmmakers without a press kit
  13. Filmmakers who are rude
  14. Filmmakers who don’t understand the role of a festival
  15. Filmmakers who fall for cons
  16. Filmmakers who ignore relationships

In other words, if you want to be loved by film festivals, do the exact opposite of this list.

My take: FilmFreeway lists over 13,000 film festivals. The biggest piece of advice that I think is missing from Elliot’s list above is: choose wisely. In other words, understand the goals for your film, set a budget and then narrow down your list of festivals to the ones that have shown films like yours in the past. Be honest with yourself about the film’s quality and uniqueness. After all, it will be competing against potentially thousands of other submissions: “For TIFF, we get between 4,000 to 4,500 films every year. Sundance gets 10,000 to 11,000 every year.”

Barbenheimer continues to wow in weekend 2!

Posted on by
1

July 21, 2023, saw the release of both Greta Gerwig‘s Barbie and Christopher Nolan‘s Oppenheimer, and rather than cannibalize each other’s audience, this synergistic counter-programming resulted in the fourth biggest combined weekend box office of all time.

But the numbers don’t lie. Barbie is more popular than Oppenheimer, earning twice as much. Their combined total is well over $1B to date.

My take: It appears plastic out-punches plutonium.

Sound of Freedom motivates its audience to support justice by watching

Posted on by
Reply

William Hughes asks on The A.V Club: How the hell did Sound Of Freedom make $100 million?

He begins:

“It’s not every day that a $15 million movie, released by an independent producer, and paid for at least in part through crowdfunding, can climb to the top of the box office charts. And yet, that’s exactly the fate that’s greeted Angel Studios’ Sound Of Freedom, which has just passed the $100 million mark after just three weeks in theaters, making it the most successful independent film of 2023 by a country mile.”

Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel and was produced by Angel Studios.

The Numbers charts Sound of Freedom in second place at the US box office for the week starting July 14, 2023.

Brian Welk on IndieWire explains the marketing and financing of the film.

My take: you would think a movie about child trafficking would be a tough sell. Faith-based Angel Studios created a community of motivated producers who greenlit this project. It then developed a Pay It Forward scheme allowing people to buy free tickets for others. Both raised money and created invested promoters. The power of community!

Hollywood Writers and Actors on strike together for first time in 63 years

Posted on by
Reply

Katie Kilkenny and Winston Cho report in The Hollywood Reporter that Actors and Writers Make History With Bid to Reshape Industry in Hollywood’s High-Stakes Strike.

They lead with:

“On July 13, SAG-AFTRA, led by president Fran Drescher, called the union’s first strike against film and television companies in 43 years. Combined with Hollywood writers ongoing strike, the work stoppage — applying to 160,000 members, from actors to singers to dancers — marks the first simultaneous strike by the two unions since 1960, in a sign of an industry in tumult.”

In a redefined industry that now embraces streaming, the issues are pay, residuals, benefits and — AI.

“During the 2023 round of negotiations, the union has been seeking to codify consent and compensation terms for performers when their work is ingested into AI technology, and create guardrails around potential uses. The AMPTP said it offered a ‘groundbreaking AI proposal which protects performers’ digital likenesses, including a requirement for performer’s consent for the creation and use of digital replicas or for digital alterations of a performance.’ Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA’s chief negotiator and national executive director, on July 13 denounced the proposal for only paying background performers for one day of work in exchange for the rights to their digital likeness ‘for the rest of eternity with no compensation.’ He added, ‘If you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.'”

USC history professor Steve Ross, who studies entertainment labour, says this time there’s an “existential threat to writers and potentially to actors. This is no longer just about improving your wages and your benefits. This is about keeping your job in the future.”

My take: Workers of the world, unite!

A Better Green Screen

Posted on by
Reply

Devin Coldewey reports on TechCrunch that Netflix’s AI-assisted green screen bathes actors in eye-searing magenta.

Netflix researchers have described an experimental way to create more accurate green screen mattes. They propose lighting subjects with magenta light in front of a green background. Devin says:

“The technique is clever in that by making the foreground only red/blue and the background only green, it simplifies the process of separating the two. A regular camera that would normally capture those colors instead captures red, blue and alpha. This makes the resulting mattes extremely accurate, lacking the artifacts that come from having to separate a full-spectrum input from a limited-spectrum key background.”

Once the mattes are created, green information needs to be added back to the subjects. The solution? AI. It learns how to do this task more accurately than a simple green filter:

Read the full paper here.

My take: Not quite ready for prime time, especially if actors need to perform under magenta lights.

How to Make a Better Movie Trailer

Posted on by
Reply

Nerdstalgic asks, “What Killed the Movie Trailer?”

They say:

“Movie Trailers may have started out as a tool to sell films, but over time they have evolved into their own spectacle. Before a film is released there are a multitude of Theatrical Trailers, TV Spots, Web Shorts, and even Trailers before the Trailer starts. How did Hollywood turn from a simple marketing tool, to a an ever expansive industry of movie trailers that mostly give away the entire plot of the film? How did Hollywood crush the Movie Trailer?”

Vanity Fair provides more background on How Movie Trailers are Created:

“Movie marketing expert and creative director Jessica Fox takes us through the steps of creating a successful movie trailer. From the collaborative process that takes place between filmmakers, studios and creative agencies to audience testing, she breaks down how each play a role in deciding how much is shown, what stories are told, and why trailers tease missing scenes from the film’s final cut.”

My take: I think the job of trailers is much harder today than in the past, given the fractured entertainment environment and peoples’ frenzied attention spans. And yet the goal remains the same: get folks to watch the whole movie. But I think the “Exquisite Corpse” might-as-well-be-a-random-sampling-of-the-movie trailer editing method is not working well. (Imagine if they did that with books — a word salad of the paragraphs from five pages of a four hundred page novel.) I much prefer the “In a world where…” trailer structure that is once removed from the film but still sets up the premise and asks the audience a question, one that they can only answer if they watch the movie. Oh, and my pet peeve? I feel cheated if the music in the trailer is not in the movie.

Academy makes it harder for indies to qualify for Best Picture in 2024

Posted on by
Reply

Josh Rottenberg and Glenn Whipp report in The Los Angeles Times that The Oscars are changing the rules for best picture.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced the news on Wednesday, June 21, 2023:

“The Academy’s Board of Governors has approved new requirements to broaden the public theatrical exhibition criteria for Oscars® eligibility in the Best Picture category starting with the 97th Academy Awards®, for films released in 2024.
Upon completion of an initial qualifying run, currently defined as a one-week theatrical release in one of the six U.S. qualifying cities, a film must meet the following additional theatrical standards for Best Picture eligibility:

  • Expanded theatrical run of seven days, consecutive or non-consecutive, in 10 of the top 50 U.S. markets, no later than 45 days after the initial release in 2024.
  • For late-in-the-year films with expansions after January 10, 2025, distributors must submit release plans to the Academy for verification.
  • Release plans for late-in-the-year films must include a planned expanded theatrical run, as described above, to be completed no later than January 24, 2025.
  • Non-U.S. territory releases can count towards two of the 10 markets.
  • Qualifying non-U.S. markets include the top 15 international theatrical markets plus the home territory for the film.”

My take: These new rules begin in 2024, for Best Picture contenders in the 2025 awards. It’s interesting to compare the number of theatres for winners Everything Everywhere All At Once, The Whale and Nomadland.

The Elevation Pictures Playbook

Posted on by
Reply

Etan Vlessing reports in The Hollywood Reporter on Elevation Pictures’ 10-Year Journey to Canadian Indie Powerhouse.

He notes:

“As an indie distributor, Elevation competes in the shadow of Hollywood studios dominating the local multiplex with star-driven tentpoles by embracing indie filmmakers in Canada and international art house titles.”

“Many of Elevation’s potentially zeitgeist-capturing releases come via output deals with American partners, including Black Bear, Neon and A24, with whom Elevation is a preferred partner north of the border.”

“In all, Elevation releases about 35 indie titles a year, with a third of those locally produced or acquired at festivals on completion that hopefully will become box office winners.”

“Key to Elevation’s proven playbook is that focus on financing homegrown directors and their films, with support from local funding agencies like Telefilm Canada to share the risks and rewards on what can be an uphill battle to launch and monetize Canadian indies.”

My take: I notice on Panoscope that Elevation is almost always the leading Canadian distributor each week.

 

Movie Posters from Ghana

Posted on by
Reply

Joseph Foley admits on Creative Bloq that “I can’t get enough of these incredible Ghanaian film posters.”

Posters advertise movies. Thirty years ago in Ghana, the mobile cinema scene (entrepreneurs with vans, generators, TVs, VCRs and collections of VHS videotapes) needed posters to advertise their screenings. Hence the Ghanaian Film Poster.

Deadly Prey Gallery in Chicago sells prints of these posters. You can also commission the artists.

My take: these posters are fantastic!