Funding + Screening, together now

Brian Welk reports on IndieWire that From Film Funding to Distribution, This Partnership Gives You Control: ‘Anyone Can Do This’.

The partnership in question is between Seed&Spark and Kinema.

Unlike other crowdfunding platforms Seed&Spark is purpose-built for film & TV projects. They have a phenomenal 82% success rate.

Kinema is a tech platform that enables non-theatrical exhibition — what you may call grassroots screening tours — of films in person and online. We make it easy and rewarding for anyone, anywhere to organize moving showings and share in the proceeds.”

Brian states:

“Those who fund programs on Seed&Spark get a dedicated Kinema account manager and custom distribution consultations. Fees are waived for filmmakers with over 500 followers or over 1,000 campaign backers.”

But hey, if you want to DIY, at least check out their free online resource The Distribution Playbook.

My take: well worth further investigation!

Indie TV: self-financing your own series

Elaine Low writes on The Ankler that Indie TV is a viable model to self-finance shows.

She writes:

“In Park City for the (Sundance) festival is Cooper Raiff, the writer and director of Cha Cha Real Smooth, which just three years ago was a festival competition title that got snapped up by Apple TV+ for $15 million. This year, he’s shopping Hal & Harper — not an indie film, which would be a tough enough sell in 2025, but rather an independently financed TV series, whose path is even less clear.”

Zack Sharf quotes Raiff on making Hal & Harper in Variety as saying:

“(Selling your second movie for $15 million to Apple) makes you too confident. Because of that deal, I thought, ‘Let’s just do it with television.’ That’s what I told everyone. We’re really braving the storm with the series. ‘Cha Cha’ was sold on the backs of so many indie movies. With this, we’re trying to sell this show… so it has to be this undeniable thing to these streamers and these networks. But it made me too confident.”

See the Collider review.

Wikipedia info.

My take: this seems extremely risky, unless your budget is practically zero, you have all the locations, and everyone is volunteering their time. Or, you’ve made so much, you need write-offs? I mean it’s a great way to keep total creative control — until Season Two, that is.

Why so many movies are shot in British Columbia, Canada

Edward Vega posts on VoxWhy your favourite movies fake their locations and why so many of them are shot in Vancouver.”

It all boils down to money.

Some of the reasons he points out:

  1. Locations: Vancouver has got it all: downtowns, suburbs, rural areas, mountains and forests, all within easy travel times
  2. Infrastructure: officials, crews and the general public are film-friendly and eager to make movies
  3. Tax incentives: provincial and federal dollars are readily available as tax rebates.

btw, the whole video is sponsored by Destination Vancouver.

See also:

My take: Another reason is that British Columbia and California share the same time zone. And a further reason is the exchange rate — the Loonie is worth 69 US cents, so every dollar Hollywood spends automatically goes over 40% further north of the border. (btw, you get even more tax incentive to film in Victoria or on Vancouver Island!)

Attend platform will allow filmmakers to connect directly to cinemas

Jeremy Kay reports on Screen Daily that Former top exhibition sector lobbyists unveil digital marketplace to boost theatrical supply.

“The Attend platform will champion mid-range films that have largely disappeared from cinemas, as well as international films seeking release in North America, and films that typically receive limited theatrical release and could reach broader audiences through data-driven theatre selection, scheduling and marketing.”

Some features:

  • Filmmakers will be able to upload details and materials of their films directly
  • Exhibitors will be able to search the database
  • The platform will recommend films to exhibitors based on the preferences of their theatres and audiences
  • The platform will facilitate the logistics of projecting films in cinemas.

The Attend platform is being developed by The Fithian Group of John Fithian, Jackie Brenneman and Patrick Corcoran.

Dozens of filmmakers support the concept, including Ted Hope and Steven Soderbergh.

Read an in-depth interview with The Fithian Group for more.

My take: this solves the “supply to theatres” issue, by cutting out distributors. I’d love to see some Canadian cinemas join — not that I have anything against Canadian distributors — it’s just that Canadian filmmakers have historically been shut out of Canadian cinemas by American distributors. How ironic that this American initiative might solve that for us.

Kling is redefining CGI, with Grading up next

Tim Simmons from Theoretically Media just released a new look at Kling AI’s new 1.5 model:

In it he relates what’s new:

1080p Professional Mode: Kling 1.5 now generates videos at 1080p resolution when using Professional Mode. While it costs more credits, the output quality is significantly better and sets a new standard for AI video generation.

Motion Brush: Kling has introduced Motion Brush, a long-awaited tool in the AI video generation space. Currently, it’s only supported in the 1.0 model but will be available in 1.5 soon. Stay tuned!

End Frames: End frames have been introduced in the 1.0 model and are coming soon to the 1.5 model, allowing for smoother transitions and more control over your videos.

Using Negative Prompts: Improve your outputs by adding negative prompts to filter out undesired elements. Copy and paste the following negative prompts into your settings:

ARTIFACTS, SLOW, UGLY, BLURRY, DEFORMED, MULTIPLE LIMBS, CARTOON, ANIME, PIXELATED, STATIC, FOG, FLAT, UNCLEAR, DISTORTED, ERROR, STILL, LOW RESOLUTION, OVERSATURATED, GRAIN, BLUR, MORPHING, WARPING”

Of particular note is the emotion it’s able to generate.

Plus, Tim signals that Kling is about to add a full-featured Video Editor. Stay tuned indeed!

My take: of course, some will lament these advances. Yes, tasks that workers once spent their lives performing are now accomplished immediately. Looking at you, Medieval scribe, hot metal typesetter, telephone exchange operator. More job transformation is sure to come. We are well into the Digital Age and its promise is bearing increasingly wondrous fruit.

New Generated Video pipeline?

A couple of very recent videos point to a potential new Generated Video, or GV, pipeline.

The first is “Create Cinematic Ai Videos with Kling Ai! – Ultra Realistic Results” by Seattle’s Yutao Han, aka Tao Prompts.

The second is “How-To Create Uncensored Images Of Anyone (Free)” by Lisbon’s Igor Pogany, aka The AI Advantage.

Imagine combining both into a new GV pipeline:

  1. Train custom character models
  2. Create key frames utilizing these custom models
  3. Animate clips with these key frames
  4. Upscale these clips
  5. Edit together.

My take: a lot of people will immediately claim this is heresy, and threatens the very foundations of cinema as we’ve come to know it over the last one hundred years. And they would be right. And yet, time marches on. I believe some variation of this is the future of ultra-low budget production. Very soon the quality will surpass the shoddy CGI that many multi-million dollar Hollywood productions have been foisting on us lately.

Reality check: LTX Studio mid-2024

You’ve seen the Sora samples. The Dream Machine videos. How does LTX Studio, touted as “the future of storytelling, transforming imagination into reality,” stand up?

Haydn Rushworth posted this review:

“There are whole bunch of things it does not do, but I love where it’s going and where I hope it’s going to go…. It’s brilliant for keeping track of all of the shots that you really do need to keep track of. It’s brilliant for scene wide settings and project wide settings, something I’ve been craving, and it’s really, really good at that. It’s great for casting. It’s brilliant for allowing you to then kind of just drop those characters in. I love the generative tools that will allow you to erase bits that you don’t need in your starting shot and to add other bits that you need that will help you tidy up the shot…. My two big gripes and I don’t think these are bugs that they’re going to fix, this is just fundamental features that it needs to be in there. One of them is every shot is slow motion…. Secondly, breaking the fourth wall. It drives me out of my mind!”

Note that LTX Studio can do lots of things:

  • Pitch Decks
  • Storyboards
  • Animatics
  • Videos

Check out the video at the bottom of the corporate webpage.

Here’s a peek at actually using LTX Studio by Riley Brown:

My take: In addition to Haydn’s slo mo and fourth wall gripes, I would add these requirements as well: movement and expression control including blinking and lip-sync. Mid-2024, one has to use each of the many AI tools for what it does best and then bring all the bits together in post. As an early proponent of Machinima (using video games to make movies,) I’m watching this space with interest. My conclusion: advances are being made but we’re nowhere near lucid dreaming.

How do you finance a low-budget movie in Canada?

Case studies detailing how low-budget movies are financed in Canada are almost non-existent. But I found one!

Courtesy of LA’s The Film Collaborative, Rob Vroom details how he financed 2022’s $2.5M “You Can Live Forever,” a quirky tale of forbidden love. The seminal takeaway:

We secure a pre-license TV deal that then triggers a top-up fund and the provincial and federal tax credits.

The summary states:

“To fund Canadian narrative feature You Can Live Forever, Rob Vroom was able to utilize some of the same backers and funders he had used with previous films. They secured a pre-license TV deal that triggered Canadian federal top-up funding and Canadian tax credits. Canadian funding most of the time requires distribution to be in place beforehand, and although the film was Sarah Watts’ and Mark Slutsky’s first feature, Canadian distributor Mongrel Media stepped up and came on early.”

Robert explains:

“I proposed a CAD $2.5 million Canadian budget. I was able to raise that money through Telefilm Canada—through SODEC—which is our Quebec provincial equivalent to Telefilm, via a pre-license deal with CBC and a top-up fund through the CMF (Canadian Media Fund). If you can secure a pre-license fee of at least 5% of your budget, then CMF will top up another 15% of your budget, which for us was huge. And then of course tax credits.”

This table is very revealling:

equity / grant / TV licence / tax credit amount
SODEC CAD $750,000
Telefilm CAD $550,000
CBC Films CAD $125,000
CMF CAD $373,500
Provincial Tax Credits CAD $402,000
Federal Tax Credits CAD $80,000
COVID Support Fund CAD $195,000
Producer Investment CAD $15,000

To summarize how to finance a low-budget feature film in Canada:

  1. Get Telefilm Canada funding.
  2. Get a Canadian Distributor (see below.)
  3. Get a TV license to trigger CMF funds.
  4. Make the movie and apply for Canadian federal and provincial tax credits.

My take: Some might wait until their festival release and the hoped-for bidding war, but I think it’s a great idea to get a Canadian distributor on board as soon as possible. They can help you secure:

  • A direct pitch to a foreign streamer doing business in Canada that as of September 2024 must contribute 5% of Canadian revenue to CanCon (and they can choose to direct invest 2% of that 5%.) See http://www.informediation.com/blog/2024/06/19/is-the-digital-ecosystem-starting-to-look-a-lot-like-tv/ The Big Three are Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+. (CAVCO insists you approach these through a Canadian distributor to qualify for Tax Credits!)
  • A Canadian TV deal. They’ll get you in the room to pitch to CBC (includes GEM,) Bell Media (includes CraveTV,) and Rogers. This will then trigger Canada Media Fund funds.
  • An Educational TV deal: Knowledge Network in BC and TVO in Ontario.
  • Airlines for in-flight entertainment.
  • US and International distribution deals.
  • A one-week screening in Toronto to qualify for the Toronto Film Critics Association’s $50K Rogers Best Canadian Film Award, perhaps the biggest film cash prize in Canada. See https://torontofilmcritics.com/awards/signature-award-2-2/ (Hey Rogers, why did you reduce this prize by half, from $100,000? Are you goading someone else to offer more? Netflix and Prime, I’m looking at you!)

Telefilm funds Lim’s “The Bryce Lee Story” for $500K

Local Victoria, BC, filmmaker Arnold Lim has just secured $500,000 from Telefilm Canada towards the funding of his second feature film “The Bryce Lee Story“.

Arnold is in Paris currently, preparing as Photography Manager for the Paris Olympics — his fifth! He graciously replied to my questions by email.

Q: Congratulations, Arnold! What’s the log line for “The Bryce Lee Story”?
A: The Bryce Lee Story is the story of a young Asian boy named Bryce Lee, who lies about being related to Bruce Lee in order to fit in at school.

Q: What’s your budget and how much has Telefilm committed?
A: We are aiming for a $1.5-million budget, which will be my first low budget film as a Director after working predominantly in micro-budget filmmaking and Telefilm has committed $500,000 to our project.

Q: Where in the world and when are you filming?
A: I love Vancouver Island and feel my home island is vastly underrepresented on film despite literarily being one of the best places on earth. We plan to shoot most of the film in Greater Victoria and Chemainus. My goal is to shoot here for every film if possible.

Q: What’s the biggest issue you face right now?
A: The biggest challenge is funding! Always funding, but equal to that my biggest issue is probably going to be casting. Finding Asian actors in Canada, especially young Asian actors is very challenging for a lot of reasons: from there not being many opportunities for them to begin with, so there aren’t a ton of opportunities to gain on-set experience and grow as an actor; to the performing arts not necessarily being a focus for some Asian parents as an activity for their children. There are of course exceptions but largely casting is always one of my biggest fears going into any film I make that has an Asian lead.

Q: Are there any locations or props in the script that you know are going to be difficult to find?
A: I am going to be looking for working versions of some 90’s cameras so props and production design are going to be a major challenge because our film is set in the late 90’s ish — but I am also excited by the proposition, and grinding those challenges out with a group of dedicated and like-minded artists is something I am excited about.

Q: Are there any cameo roles and do you have folks in mind?
A: I do have at least one in mind. But I can’t say who it is quite yet. 😉 Sorry!

Q: How does going to the Olympics as Photography Manager impact your time?
A: I am very privileged to have the opportunity to be a part of the Olympic experience, but it is always a time of hyper focus for me because it is such a challenging job. In my opinion the amount of time and energy and love and artistry and passion and gruelling grind necessary is akin to making a feature film and I love the challenge of it, but it is a marathon and takes a lot of time and energy and pulls me away from my family. I really miss my wife and children when I am away.

Q: Is there anything else you’d like to add?
A: I can’t thank Telefilm enough for the opportunity to make a second feature film, but I am also extremely proud of and grateful to the amazing artists on Vancouver Island and in B.C. who work in and support independent film. I have this opportunity because of amazing people like the producer Lynne Lee and many, many other cast and crew, especially on Vancouver Island, who have chosen to work with me and share their passion and artistry even when the prospects of making money are low and the challenges are high. I can’t thank them all enough.

My take: What can’t Arnold do? Next week I’ll look a ways to raise $1M — if you have ideas, let’s hear them!

Sex in Cinema in 2024

Stephen Follows claims in Why is sex in movies declining? that “Comparing each year to the baseline of 2000, we can see a steady decline in the amount of sex in feature films. By 2023, it had fallen by almost 40% from the start of the century.”

He says the reasons for this could be:

  1. There are fewer sexual scenes overall.
  2. There are more movies without any scenes of a sexual nature, particularly in action and thriller genres.
  3. Producers and filmmakers might be more sensitive to how sexual content could be perceived or potentially lead to controversy.
  4. Explicit sex scenes could result in more restrictive age ratings or censorship, thereby reducing a film’s international box office potential.
  5. There might be less demand for sexual content in wide-release films on family-friendly streaming platforms.
  6. There could be a rejection of outdated stereotypes as seen through a predominantly male gaze.
  7. The availability of more adult content elsewhere.

However, Jillian Angelini claims on Pop SugarSex Scenes Are So Back — and Better.

She says, “Now, explicit films such as “Poor Things,” “Love Lies Bleeding,” and “The Idea of You” are sending a clear message: Hollywood is hornier than ever.

She concludes:

Sex scenes are back, but not like they were before. Instead, they’re transforming to reflect desires for more respectful and authentic intimacy. This era suggests a promising shift towards more inclusive cinema where on-screen intimacy can feel empowering and enlightening for all.”

My take: People who know me know I love romance in movies. Conversely, I abhor violence. Make love, not war!