Category Archives: Monetize Video

Technology saves “last Beatles song”

Posted on by
Reply

The Beatles have just released their last single, Now and Then.

It appears as a free VEVO music video as well as these for-purchase products: various versions of vinyl and cassette.

“Now and Then” was a demo John Lennon recorded in The Dakota in the late 1970’s. The main reason it’s The Beatles’ last single is because until now it was too hard to separate John’s vocals from the piano notes. Technology to the rescue:

Want to know more? Check out this Parlogram documentary.

My take: I like this video most when it starts incorporating images from “Then” with footage from “Now” viz. 1:47, 1:55, etc. I would have liked to have seen much more of this technique used. This is truly the visualization of Now and Then — show us more!

Unfortunately, I’m not overly enamoured with the song itself; I find it middling and melancholic. I also don’t like:

  • The graphics and the cover image — boring!
  • The first few shots of the video are over-sharpened and plop us in the “uncanny valley” — not a good start.
  • The lip sync is poor — if you’re going to use AI, why not go all the way and use AI to reshape the mouths for perfect sync?
  • I think they missed a great opportunity to have Paul and Ringo sing verses in their own voices. Again, why not go all in and use AI to voice clone George and have him sing a verse too?

As to “last singles” — I think they should give this treatment the last song the Beatles actually recorded together: The End. Although, after 60 years, perhaps it’s just time to move on.

The ticktokification of media and how to stop doomscrolling

Posted on by
Reply

Enrico Tartarotti of @enricotartarotti on Youtube asks the question: Short Form Content Is BROKEN. Can We Fix It?

Enrico believes, in his own words:

“TikTok, YouTube Shorts and Instagram Reels have taken over the internet and completely changed how we view content by spreading short form content and videos everywhere. But… they are already failing. Meanwhile, long form content is having a renaissance. There is a way to save our brains from frying off retention hacks and that is… joining forces.”

He presents his case in five chapters.

  • Part 1: Why everything became a copy of TikTok
  • Part 2: Attention spans and retention black holes
  • Part 3: The Problem — falling apart
  • Part 4: The other side
  • Part 5: The Solution — the missing link

His solution? Enrico proposes changes that will harness society’s doomscrolling dopamine addiction.

  1. Link long and short content in a meaningful way, so that shorts lead to more in-depth media
  2. Change what the algorithm optimizes for, to packages of both short and corresponding longer media
  3. Allow creators to build real businesses, so they can live meaningful lives and still contribute to society.

Well worth 15 minutes!

My take: Fascinating! I will admit to wasting hours of time scrolling through short form content and I detest the “endless scroll” design of modern media apps. I like that Enrico links the rise in short form content with the rise in the sheer number of videos, suggesting that this is merely a solution to discoverability.

Streaming films are pirated immediately

Posted on by
2

Tyler Aquilina reports in Variety on The Most Pirated Film Titles of 2022.

“Exclusive data provided to Variety Intelligence Platform by piracy-focused research firm Muso measured 2022 activity across a wide range of piracy sites, including illegal streaming, torrent, web download and stream-ripping platforms. The results reveal that superhero films held a dominant share of illegal viewing in 2022, with Marvel and DC releases collectively accounting for 70% of piracy demand (that is, illicit streams, downloads and the like) for the top 10 most pirated film titles of the year.”

Here are the top ten 2022 most pirated movies:

  1. Spider-Man: No Way Home (21%)
  2. The Batman (13%)
  3. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (10%)
  4. Thor: Love and Thunder (9%)
  5. Black Adam (9%)
  6. Uncharted (8%)
  7. Eternals (8%)
  8. Top Gun: Maverick (8%)
  9. Jurassic World Dominion (7%)
  10. Encanto (6%)

“Spikes in a film’s piracy tend to coincide with its release on digital platforms, which enables the availability of high-quality pirated streams or downloads, as opposed to bootleg ‘cam-rip’ versions illicitly recorded in a theater.”

My take: there are two takeaways for me here: 1) once a film streams, it will be pirated immediately (not sure about VOD though,) and therefore 2) theatrical distribution is still a viable way to generate revenue and word-of-mouth for a film.

Save the Pic-a-Flic Video Collection!

Posted on by
Reply

SIGN THE PETITION NOW!

Roxanne Egan-Elliott reports in the Times Colonist that Victoria’s Pic-A-Flic Video is closing after 40 years:

“Pic-A-Flic Video, one of the last places in Greater Victoria to rent a movie or TV series, plans to close its doors in September after four decades. Opened in 1983, Pic-A-Flic has more than 25,000 titles, from silent movies to new releases, most of which are not available on streaming services or anywhere else, owner Kent Bendall said.”

What to do with all those DVDs?

A change.org petition says: “We cannot allow this collection to be scattered to the winds without having a serious conversation about how it could be permanently housed by UVic and the Greater Victoria Public Library.”

My take: I have a modest proposal! How about the RBCM buy the collection AND hire Kent Bendall to continue operating a video store from Old Town or some other suitable space?

More on ad-supported movie distribution

Posted on by
Reply

Brian Welk, reports on IndieWire, about Inside the Strange and Prickly World of Ad-Supported Indie Film Distribution.

He writes:

“AVOD (advertising-based video on demand) streamers often license unknown or obscure movies in bulk from distributors like FilmRise, Gravitas Ventures, Shout! Factory, Cinedigm, and… Homestead Entertainment, a tiny distributor in Laguna Beach, California that specializes in working with filmmakers to access non-exclusive AVOD deals on dozens of services.”

He adds:

“Also in the game are self-service film aggregators. FilmHub cofounder Alan s’Escragnolle said his company has distributed more than 17,000 movies since January 2020, supplying as much as 15 percent of Tubi’s 50,000-film library. He said FilmHub works with upward of 100 services and claimed distributors have started leaning on them to reach more niche or international streamers.”

Note that at pennies per view, millions of streams are required to make serious money.

My take: this is empowering. It kinda hearkens back to the Roger Corman days when cheaply-made “B” movies connected with their audiences and launched the careers of many directors and actors. The key is to start with the audience, reverse-engineer a riveting story for them and then make the film reasonably. And to stomach ads… gulp!

Titles and Thumbnail are Critical to Your Success

Posted on by
1

Kent Lamm of Standard Story Company warns that YouTube will BURY your films without this. The this? Your title and thumbnail.

He says:

“Getting your film SEEN in the Age of YouTube is a different game. Your title and thumbnail have a huge effect in how many people will watch your movie. Give your short film or feature its best shot by optimizing your title and thumbnail and planning ahead.”

The Title should be:

  1. meaningful for your film,
  2. unique,
  3. catchy,
  4. grammatically simple,
  5. seo-able, and
  6. have an available domain name.

He admires the way Omeleto titles their films: Logline sentence. | Film Title

He also thinks getting the genre into the title helps.

The Thumbnail should be:

  1. a compelling image that’s going to get people interested,
  2. most likely a frame-grabbed close up of the main character,
  3. but why not get some dedicated stills on set?

My take: This stuff can’t be an afterthought. In fact, I think that after the film title, the film logo and one central image can really help you fine tune the script, narrow the audience and solidify the entertainment promise (probably because I worked as a graphic designer for many years.) Oh, as to the title, you might as well choose from the beginning of the alphabet rather than the bottom half.

TikTok rewards its creative stars

Posted on by
Reply

Zheping Huang says on Bloomberg that TikTok Turns on the Money Machine.

He reports:

“The most downloaded app of 2021, TikTok has surged to a billion-plus global users, who consume an infinite feed of short clips delivered instantly by algorithm. While the platform has long helped creators… step to the center of the attention economy, the company is only now starting to cash in on all that popularity. TikTok raked in nearly $4 billion in revenue in 2021, mostly from advertising, and is projected to hit $12 billion this year, according to the research firm eMarketer. That would make it bigger than Twitter Inc. and Snap Inc. combined — three years after it started accepting ads on the platform.”

“With a billion monthly active users, TikTok is still smaller than Facebook (2.9 billion) and Instagram (2 billion), also part of Meta. Yet TikTok’s programming is proving unusually compelling: Its average user in the US now spends about 29 hours a month with the service, more than Facebook (16 hours) and Instagram (8 hours) put together, according to mobile researcher Data.ai. Scott Galloway, a professor at New York University Stern School of Business, has likened the service’s addictiveness to opium.”

“TikTok is starting to show the profit potential in countries like the US. The company is now charging as much as $2.6 million for a one-day run of a TopView ad — the first thing that pops up on users’ feed when they open the app — roughly four times what it charged a year ago, according to a document reviewed by Bloomberg News. A 30-second Super Bowl ad runs about $6.5 million — but TikTok can charge that rate every day.”

“TikTok set up a $200 million fund in 2020 to pay creators to get views, and pledged to grow the pool to $1 billion in the US over the next three years.”

My take: this fascinates me. Creators tell stories to audiences, almost always mediated by some platform. These platforms create the commercial market. Once upon a time it was Hollywood. Then it was network television. Then it was cable television. For a brief moment it was VHS and DVD. Then online and Netflix et al. Today, the online space has short-circuited these markets, allowing audiences and creators to interact with no friction. I’m amazed at how innovative it all is!

Cannes 2022: film quotas drive national production

Posted on by
Reply

Scott Roxborough reports in The Hollywood Reporter that Wall Street Hits the Croisette: Why Private Equity Investors Are Bullish on Indie Film.

He claims:

“Private equity, or PE, firms are pumping money into the entertainment content, financing independent production and snatching up companies at a level never seen before in the indie industry…. Some of the biggest players packaging projects and inking deals on the Croisette have backing from private equity groups…. The bet PE investors are making is that the explosive growth in streaming services will lead to a similar demand boom for content. And that the companies that own the IP, the original films and TV shows the streamers need, will be best positioned to benefit.”

He traces this demand squarely back to government policy:

“Many see particularly strong growth potential in Europe, where European Union (EU) content quotas for SVOD platforms — 30 percent of all content on streaming services in Europe must be European-made — has created guaranteed demand for original, home-grown films and series which most streamers will be unable to fill on their own.”

As to Cannes, filmmaker Jeremy Lutter (pictured above) compares this year’s experience with previous ones:

“Cannes is in some ways the same and in some ways different. I would say it’s two thirds the size as previous non-COVID years in terms of events. But, considering the situation, it’s impressive! The crowds are smaller but it’s still busy. As for deals — people are looking — there’s been less movies made recently — everyone is hungry for movies. Oh yeah, instead of a gift bag, this year you get a PPE mask with a logo on it!”

My take: of course, quotas drive national production. We proved that with CanCon and Canadian music; witness the dozens of Canadian superstars, who, as Simu Liu points out about Shawn Mendes, Avril Lavigne and Arcade Fire, “like me have fulfilled the ultimate Canadian dream of making it in America — but to our credit, we always come back!”

Tension mounts between box office and streaming

Posted on by
1

In early July 2021, former Paramount Pictures boss Barry Diller claimed, “The movie business is over. The movie business as before is finished and will never come back,” in an exclusive interview with NPR.

He goes on to say:

“These streaming services have been making something that they call ‘movies.’ They ain’t movies. They are some weird algorithmic process that has created things that last 100 minutes or so…. I used to be in the movie business where you made something really because you cared about it.”

Scarlett Johansson probably agrees. She’s suing Disney over her contract for Black Widow.

Disney released the much delayed Black Widow at the same time in cinemas and on its Disney+ streaming service for an extra $29.99, a.k.a a Day-and-Date release “potentially depriving her of a huge box-office-infused paycheck” according to The Verge.

She says her 2017 contract guaranteed an implied exclusive theatrical release although Disney decided due to the pandemic stunting box office revenue they would release the blockbuster on their streaming platform on the same day. Ironically, Disney+ only came in existence in late 2019.

This had the effect of diminishing ScarJo’s potential profit participation of perhaps $50 million, on top of her base fee of $20 million.

However, on the other hand, Wild Bunch CEO Vincent Grimond believes that if independent film companies are to survive, they need to tap into online revenues, as reported in The Hollywood Reporter.

Scott Roxborough‘s article also quotes Shudder‘s global acquisitions and co-production director Emily Gotto as saying:

“We’ve found that we can get the same awareness, the same press, and marketing attention by doing an online release, without theatrical. Especially if we are dealing with genre titles, we can put it out on our service and also go through our output partnerships to put it onto physical hard goods — DVD, Blu-Ray, in some cases even specialty VHS, while also making the film available on download to own, on Apple, on iTunes, on Amazon Prime. It’s the opportunity for the film to be seen and for the filmmaker to be seen.”

He also quotes Craig Engler, general manager of Shudder, which has over one million subscribers, as saying:

“We’re very big on doing themed programming. So we might do Werewolf Month. You might have heard of The Howling, say, so we’ll use The Howling as a way to get you to check out Ginger Snaps and other great werewolf films you might never think to search out.”

My take: The film business continues to evolve. Once upon a time it was all about bums in seats. Now it’s all about eyes on screens — and everyday it matters less and less what type of screen that is. I predict the ascent of curated streaming services because it’s easier to build niche audiences and then satisfy their specific wants than to appeal to everyone. Cinemas made sense when films were physical and had to be delivered to real buildings scattered across countries: the cost of prints and advertising could easily match production budgets necessitating popular movies that everyone would want to see. Digital delivery changes everything. Mass audiences aren’t determined by geography anymore; today it’s interests that bond folks into splintered, but sizeable, audiences.

Kevin Smith to sell new movie as NFT

Posted on by
Reply

Anthony D’Alessandro reports on Deadline that Kevin Smith To Sell Horror Movie ‘Killroy Was Here’ As NFT.

Independent filmmaker Kevin Smith‘s feature “Killroy Was Here” is a horror anthology loosely based on the Kilroy was here graffiti phenomenon, sometimes described as one of the first memes.

D’Alessandro writes:

“Kevin Smith is looking to push the boundaries on indie distribution again and this time he’s auctioning off his latest horror feature anthology Killroy Was Here as an NFT (non-fungible token). The owner of the NFT will secure the rights to exhibit, distribute and stream the work, making it a means for whoever owns the movie to earn money outside of the blockchain.”

He quotes Smith as saying:

“As an indie artist, I’m always looking for a new platform through which to tell a story. And Crypto has the potential to provide that, while also intersecting with our almost 25 years of experience selling real world collectibles online and at the brick-and-mortar Jay and Silent Bob’s Secret Stash. Back in 1994, we took Clerks up to Sundance and sold it. Selling Killroy as an NFT feels very similar: whoever buys it could choose to monetize it traditionally, or simply own a film that nobody ever sees but them. We’re not trying to raise financing by selling NFT’s for a Killroy movie; the completed Killroy movie IS the NFT. And If this works, we suddenly have a new stage on which I and other, better artists than me can tell our stories.”

Check out the drop on April 21, 2021.

My take: to summarize: you write, finance and create a digital feature film, then evolve it into a unique digital item as an NFT and finally sell that for Etherium crypto-currency. Hmmm. It will be interesting to see who buys it, if they immediately resell it, if any buyer decides to hang on to it and whether they then attempt to monetize it through distribution theatrically or online through VOD or streaming or ??? Who knows? This is crazy shit!