Shoot your next film in Virtual Unreality

Oakley Anderson-Moore reports for No Film School on How One Studio Is Thriving During COVID (and Why It’s a Big Deal for Indies).

(The studio tour proper starts just before 14 minutes in this promotional video.)

“During the pandemic, one studio stayed open when most others closed. How? L.A. Castle Studios has developed ‘a better way to shoot.’ And owner Tim Pipher believes it’s the way of the future — perhaps no more so than for independent film. ‘I guess some of it comes down to luck,’ explained Pipher to No Film School. His studio has been slammed with work in the midst of the shutdowns. ‘COVID or no COVID, we think we’ve got a better way to shoot.'”

What sets this green-screen studio apart from others is the ability to shoot with a live-composited set.

Simply put, you and your actor can now create inside virtual reality.

How is this possible? It’s achieved by marrying movie making and video game 3D environments. The core software is Epic GamesUnreal Engine.

See the Unreal Engine website and its Marketplace.

Check out L.A. Castle Studios.

My take: I love this technology! Basically, it’s Star Trek‘s Holodeck with green instead of black walls. Keep in mind, as a filmmaker, you still have to address every other component other than location: for instance casting, costumes, makeup, props, blocking, lighting, shot selection and performance. Do I know any Unreal Engine gurus?

Theatrical revenue down 80% in 2020

The Hollywood Reporter reports that It’s Official: 2020 Domestic Box Office Fell 80 Percent to $2.3B Behind China’s $2.7B.

North American box office revenue plummeted 80 percent in 2020 amid the novel coronavirus pandemic and unprecedented theater closures, while global revenue tumbled more than 70 percent. Domestic movie tickets sold between Jan. 1 through Dec. 31 generated an estimated $2.3 billion compared to $11.4 billion in 2019, according to Comscore estimates. That’s the lowest showing in at least 40 years. The dramatic fall-off was expected, considering that many cinemas have been closed for more than nine months in the U.S. Globally, 2020 movie ticket sales are expected to come in between $11.5 billion and $12 billion, compared to 2019’s $42.5 billion.

For the first time ever, the Chinese market outgrossed the U.S. and had the biggest movie.

THR quotes Comscore‘s Paul Dergarabedian‘s rosy predictions for 2021:

“The movie business will be forever changed no doubt, but movie theaters will be ready for their closeup and as things slowly return to some semblance of normal, they will star in an uplifting sequel of their own. 2021 will be arguably the most important year in the history of the big screen, and one that will bridge the gap between a devastating 2020 that tragically affected so many people and impacted so profoundly many brick and mortar businesses.”

Meanwhile, cinemas are doing any and everything they can to survive. Chicago’s oldest movie theatre has even become a COVID-19 Testing Center.

Deadline has the 2020 specifics for each studio.

My take: given that theatres were only open roughly 10 weeks out of 52, the 80% decline makes sense. I don’t see any return to normal until October 2021, once the world has been vaccinated. Even though No Time to Die is scheduled to open on April 2 in Canada, wouldn’t it have made a great title for everyone’s first movie back in cinemas next Fall? In the meantime, here’s Billie Eilish‘s theme song.

2020 in review, by Netflix

Netflix has released What We Watched in 2020 and it’s very revealing!

Some highlights:

  • Searches on Netflix for ‘home baking shows’ went up almost 50% in March over February.
  • There was a huge jump in viewing of stand-up between March and April (compared to February).
  • Anime viewing was up over 100% in the US.
  • Documentaries and reality TV were watched twice as much this year.
  • Viewers also watched twice as much romance this year as in 2019.
  • Viewing of foreign language titles was up over 50% this year (compared to 2019).
  • K-drama viewing almost tripled.

Netflix concludes their report with a reflection on race relations:

“Most important of all, 2020 taught us to open our eyes. We saw this in the way we embraced My Octopus Teacher (about the importance of nature), Crip Camp (about the disability revolution in the 1970s) and The Trial of the Chicago 7 (about social justice). But it was most obvious in how we responded to the murder of George Floyd in May 2020. In the three weeks that followed his death, viewing of titles that helped us better understand the Black experience in the US soared — 13TH was up 5000+%, LA 92 up 1300+%, Dear White People up 700+%, Time: The Kalief Browder Story up 500% and American Son up 270%. And Dave Chappelle’s 8:46 video, which was shared with the world by Netflix is a Joke, became THE top trending video of the year on YouTube.”

Here are Netflix’s top five shows in six categories:

My take: yes, like everyone, we spent much more time watching TV sports, the U.S. election coverage, Dr. Bonnie Henry here in B.C. and our many streaming services. We might actually be responsible for that huge rise in K-drama viewing! Here’s hoping 2021 is better — and let’s us break our dependence on our screens for entertainment.

TikTok leads social short-video platforms

Julia Sachs writes on Grit Daily that Snapchat, Instagram and TikTok Are Eating Each Other.

Snapchat, which launched its own version of TikTok this week called Spotlight, will pay creators through a program similar to the TikTok creator fund. Spotlight runs through the Snapchat app, and will run similar to competing platforms like Instagram Reels—which also mimicked TikTok by allowing users to create short-form videos that will automatically loop.”

Got that?

Basically, these three social media platforms all now have similar short-form (<60 seconds) video capabilities.

She recounts the short history of short-form video (remember Vine?) and singles out Kylie Jenner (yes, of those Kardashians) as an instrumental figure.

Her article makes fascinating reading.

See also TikTok’s 2020 in review.

My take: I love short-form video! Kinda surprising for someone who aspires to make feature films, but I say the shorter the better. Vine was fantastic in its day! The creativity on TikTok is amazing and assures me that the new batch of storytellers will have no trouble keeping us entertained. Two hashtags to check out are #maincharacter (5 billion views) and #RatatouilleMusical (191 million views.)

2021: streaming to cost more

Frank Pallotta predicts on CNN Business that Streaming is about to get a lot more expensive.

Last week Disney+ revealed it has amassed 86 million subscribers and “will have roughly 10 new series from Marvel and Star Wars, as well as 15 Disney live action, Disney Animation and Pixar series. Disney also said that 15 new films from Pixar, Disney live action and Disney Animation will be heading to the service.”

Oh, and the price is going up in March 2021. This, after Netflix has already raised prices for US subscribers in October 2020.

Frank argues that streaming subscriptions must go up to pay for the expensive movies that will find their audiences at home in 2021 and not in cinemas:

“Take HBO Max, for example. The service from CNN’s parent company WarnerMedia announced earlier this month that it will stream movies on HBO Max the same day they drop in theaters. Whether that becomes the norm or is just a quick solution during a pandemic is yet to be seen. But if it becomes a permanent strategy, consumers will likely see their subscription prices rise over the next few years. Producing a major blockbuster like ‘Wonder Woman 1984’ isn’t cheap.”

He also quotes Bernie McTernan, a senior analyst at Rosenblatt Securities:

“Disney increasing its content budget is a big deal for the whole industry, including Netflix. It is effectively raising the bar to compete. If Disney needs to spend $14 billion to $16 billion on content, then Netflix likely needs to spend well over $20 billion to achieve the same subscriber scale globally.”

Investors will foot this with the expectation of future company profits. But given that the rate of new subscriptions is plateauing, Netflix will have no choice other than raising prices again. (They have also cancelled their free month trial subscription.)

My take: and don’t forget that in Canada GST will become payable on your foreign streaming services come mid-year. Yes, streaming will definitely cost more in 2021.

Film Festivals move online for now

Chris Lindahl reports on IndieWire that Numerous Distributors Pulled Films from Online Film Festivals in 2020.

He refers to a new report recently released called The New Era of Indie Film Exhibition by Jon Fitzgerald, Brian Newman and Lela Meadow-Conner.

They surveyed 100 filmmakers, film festivals and distributors.

The insights are somewhat predictable:

  • 70% of filmmakers expect to share in a percentage of online film festival ticket sales.
  • 79% of film festivals had films withdrawn after the decision was made to move online.
  • “70% of distributor said that geoblocking and ticket caps were decided on a case by case basis, but 60% of distributors said they preferred ticket caps on virtual screenings. 30% of distributors said that if a film they wanted to acquire was not geoblocked they would let the filmmaker know that would stop them from making an acquisition.”

Specifically, filmmakers want to see:

  1. “More breakout sessions with filmmakers
  2. More networking and access to industry players
  3. More live Q&A sessions with audiences
  4. More flexibility in viewing times, not just a one time stream
  5. Better stats and data after the festival
  6. Social component, more interaction with audiences
  7. More press and social promotion
  8. Audience data & email lists
  9. More help in creating revenue opportunities for filmmakers
  10. More open dialogue with the filmmakers
  11. More panel discussions & educational offerings”

My take: this report makes fascinating reading and illustrates the vastly different, and opposing, goals of filmmakers, film festivals and distributors when it comes to the festival circuit. I would say filmmakers and film festivals are united in wanting as much “exposure” as possible whereas distributors would prefer festivals to remain as small and exclusive as possible so they can further “exploit” their acquisitions commercially.

Gambling $1M+ on your indie action film

Garry Maddox of Australia’s The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Maverick Aussie director puts up $1.6m of his own money — for killer robot movie.

“Longtime Australian commercials director and cinematographer Mark Toia came up with a preposterously ambitious idea for a debut film: a CIA test of military robots goes disastrously wrong when a group of American doctors arrive in a Cambodian jungle for humanitarian work. Toia, 56, then shot it around the world – starting in Cambodia then moving on to Vancouver, New York and Brisbane. And he and his wife put up $1.6 million of their own ‘hard cash’ to make it, without a cent from government agencies or the film industry. He spent a year seeing whether he could get backing in the US before he and wife Carolyn decided to do it all themselves. ‘I thought, you know what, I don’t really need the money. Screw it. I’m going to do this as a bit of an indie film now for the masses and sell it ourselves.‘”

The result, Monsters of Man, begins streaming online on December 8, 2020.

Do they think they’ll make any profit?

I have no idea. I decided that if I was going to do a movie, I’d just do my own just for more of a therapy, relaxation type thing. And it was therapeutic. Because we funded it ourselves, I didn’t have to listen to anyone. Because I was a painter as a child, it was like a painting for me. It was like working in my garage, painting away.

Check out the movie’s website.

My take: that’s a great concept! And kudos to Mark and Carolyn for putting up their own money. If the movie is anything like the trailer it could be good! I’m slightly spooked by the running time, though.

How to compete with Hollywood

In a Film Courage interview, indie filmmaker Geoff Ryan claims, “Your movie will never compete with Hollywood.

Given that, what should we do?

“I wanted to create something that people would walk away from thinking I’ve never seen anything like that before. A small indie like this can’t compete with Hollywood for spectacle and star power, but we can try to make much more interesting films at least. Make something that when people walk away from it they don’t just forget about it. I want to say it was Kubrick but some director I remember reading years ago said I don’t care if they love it or hate it, I want them to remember it.

Looks like he’s done that with his latest feature; see the trailer below.

My take: this is great advice! Lacking millions of dollars, we must have something else to beat Hollywood at its own game. That something is: story, attitude and ingenuity.

CMF: no broadcaster, no problem!

The Canada Media Fund quietly announced a new fund last week: the Development Pilot Program – Experienced Producers.

Up to $100,000 matching funds are available per project, and — the kicker — no broadcaster need be attached.

“This program supports projects in the development stage by experienced producers where no Canadian broadcaster is attached. The total amount of funding available in the program is $3M, divided on a 2/3 English and 1/3 French basis. Eligible projects must be in the Drama, Children & Youth or Documentary genres.”

Take note: this funding is first come, first served, and opens November 26, 2020.

Experienced Producers are those who have worked with the CMF over the last five years creating at least:

  • 5 Dramas, or
  • 4 Children & Youth live-action projects, or
  • 4 Children & Youth animation projects, or
  • 5 Documentary series, or
  • 6 Documentary one-off projects, or
  • 4 Documentary POV projects.

This funding will be welcome relief to 30 or more producers who can continue developing projects during these strange times.

My take: Hey, experienced producers! I have three scripts ready for further development — give me a call! Seriously.

Liberals Want Broadcasting Act Changes

The Canadian Liberal government has tabled proposed changes to the Broadcasting Act.

The Act authorizes the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to set the rules for media in Canada. It’s a big reason there is a music business and television industry in Canada.

The Act was last updated in 1991 — almost 30 years ago — well before the rise of the Internet and online streaming.

Some of the changes the Liberals propose are:

  • Confirming that online broadcasting is covered under the Act. Currently, online undertakings that deliver audio and audio-visual content over the Internet are exempt from licensing and most other regulatory requirements. The Bill clarifies that online undertakings are within the scope of the broadcasting regulatory system. The Bill provides the CRTC with new powers to regulate online audio and audio-visual services, allowing the CRTC to create conditions of service and other regulatory requirements under which these online broadcasters would operate in Canada. It also updates the CRTC’s regulatory powers as they relate to traditional broadcasters. The Bill ensures that the Act would not apply to users of social media services, or social media services themselves for content posted by their users. The Bill ensures that online broadcasters will only be regulated when doing so would contribute in a material manner to the objectives of the Act. It will be up to the CRTC to determine which services will be regulated.
  • Updating the Broadcasting and Regulatory Policies for Canada. The Bill updates key elements of the broadcasting policy for Canada so that the broadcasting system is more inclusive of all Canadians. The Bill recognizes that the Canadian broadcasting system should, through its programming and the employment opportunities arising out of its operations, serve the needs and interests of all Canadians—including Francophones and Anglophones, Indigenous Peoples, Canadians from racialized communities and Canadians of diverse ethnocultural backgrounds, socioeconomic statuses, abilities and disabilities, sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and ages. The Bill underscores that programming that reflects Indigenous cultures in Canada should be provided within the Canadian broadcasting system, regardless of resource availability. It also says there must be a space for Indigenous media undertakings in the Canadian broadcasting system. Additional amendments would also serve to promote greater accessibility for persons with disabilities.
  • Creating a more flexible approach to regulation and sustainable funding for Canadian stories. The Bill facilitates a flexible approach to regulation, which will allow the CRTC to tailor the conditions of service and other regulatory requirements imposed on broadcasters by considering the Act’s policy and regulatory objectives, the variety of broadcasters in the system (and the differences between them), and determining what is fair and equitable depending on the circumstances. The Bill provides the CRTC with express powers to require broadcasting undertakings, including online undertakings, to make financial contributions to Canadian content and creators.
  • Modernizing the CRTC’s enforcement powers. The Bill provides the CRTC with new enforcement powers through an administrative monetary penalty scheme (AMPs), which aligns the CRTC’s enforcement powers with how it regulates telecommunications and spam. The objective of the AMPs scheme would be to promote compliance, not to punish.
  • Updating oversight and information-sharing provisions. The Bill ensures that the CRTC has the tools it needs as a modern regulator, so that it may gather information from stakeholders and liaise with other departments and agencies. It also ensures that commercially sensitive information that is collected by the CRTC in the course of its proceedings is properly protected.

The expected outcomes are:

  • More opportunities for Canadian producers, directors, writers, actors, and musicians to create high quality audio and audiovisual content and to make that content available to Canadian audiences.
  • An equitable and flexible regulatory framework where comparable broadcasting services are subject to similar regulatory requirements, taking into account their distinct business models and other relevant circumstances.
  • Canadian music and stories being more available through a variety of services.
  • A more diverse and inclusive broadcasting system that is reflective of Canadian society and that serves Canadians from all walks of life.

See Lexology for further analysis.

Mobile Syrup notes: “If the CRTC requires online broadcasters, such as Netflix and Spotify, to contribute to Canadian content at a similar rate to traditional broadcasters, then their contributions to Canadian music and stories could amount to up to $830 million by 2023.”

Not everyone is happy though.

The Friends of Canadian Broadcasting are: “concerned by the fact that multiple sections of the Broadcasting Act have been repealed or amended to remove protections for Canadian culture. For example, the bill moves from mandating ‘maximum or predominant use’ of Canadian creative resources to using Canadian resources ‘to the extent that it is appropriate.’ It also removes language that the broadcasting system should be owned and controlled by Canadians, opening the door to foreign companies to buy up what’s left of Canada’s traditional broadcasting system.”

Michael Geist argues:

“In the short term, this bill creates considerable uncertainty that could lead to reduced investment in Canadian film and television production and less consumer choice as potential new streaming entrants avoid the Canadian market until there is greater clarity on the cost of doing business. Canada is set to become a highly regulated market for Internet streaming services and the uncertainty regarding those costs are sure to have an impact. The regulatory process will take years to unfold with a call for public comment, a lengthy hearing, the initial decision, applications to review and vary the decision, judicial reviews, and potential judicial appeals. If any of the appeals are successful, the CRTC would be required to re-examine its decision and the process starts anew. This lengthy process could have a major impact on investment decisions. For example, if you’re a large Internet streaming company that is already investing $100 million per year in film and television production in Canada, you might delay some of that spending until there is greater clarity on what ‘counts’ for the purposes of meeting your new regulatory requirements. New entrants may also delay entering into the Canadian market given the prospect of significant new spending requirements and regulatory intervention into confidential business information. Canada was once a highly attractive market for new services, but this bill may cause new entrants to rethink their plans.

My take: change is almost always difficult. However, given that the Liberals helm a minority government, the chance of this legislation actually becoming law is very slim. More likely it will die on the Order Paper when the next election is called — I’m guessing in June 2021.