U2 shows us the way with live mobile streaming

First Youtube enabled anyone to post moving images to the Internet, democratizing the movies.

Now mobile streaming apps are revolutionizing live broadcasting, once the domain of television.

Having just launched within the last three months, both Meerkat and Periscope enable anyone with a smartphone to stream live video broadcasts in realtime to the world.

Meerkat (IOS and Android) wants you to first log in to Twitter. The left column lists upcoming streams, comments are on the right and the stream is featured vertically in the middle. Meerkat loves the colour yellow.

Periscope (IOS and Adroid) was purchased by Twitter shortly after Meerkat debuted. Comments are superimposed in the bottom left-hand corner, and you can show some ‘love’ with hearts that float up the right side of the vertical screen.

You can search Twitter to find live Meerkat streams or live Periscope streams.

Or, New York digital & social agency, GLOW, offers two ways to sample multiple streams:

Rock band U2 have embraced Meerkat. During the current i+e Tour, according to The Hollywood Reporter,

“The band invites an audience member onto the B stage to shoot a stripped-down number — on this night, ‘Angel of Harlem’ — to be broadcast live via the fledgling Meerkat platform. ‘This goes out across the globe — to about 150 people, until it catches on,’ Bono quipped.”

My take: I think this is truly revolutionary. The ‘airwaves’ for traditional TV broadcasters are strictly controlled by the FCC in America and the CRTC in Canada. Now, everyone with a smartphone has a ‘TV’ camera in their pocket and can begin broadcasting to the world at any time, for free! Journalism and entertainment may never be the same again. Interestingly, both apps use a mobile-friendly vertical orientation, which is decidedly uncinematic.

Netflix at Cannes

As reported in Variety, Netflix Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos recently outlined their strategy to break into the film business at the Cannes Film Festival, again.

Recall that Netflix upended the TV industry when it began producing its own series like “Lilyhammer,” “House of Cards” and “Orange Is the New Black.”

“Sarnados said that when Netflix launched in 1997, 90% of the content viewed on the service was movies. Now it’s only 33%, with TV series making up two-thirds of what people watch on Netflix.”

Sarandos mentioned Netflix has five or six feature projects in the works, some picked up at film festivals, some produced in-house.

Budgets range from $10 to $50 million.

Some will go straight to Neflix (like Adam Sandler’s “Ridiculous 8”) and some will be released theatrically first. He would like to see more day and date releases.

Not everyone will recall that Netflix previously operated a film acquisition and production company called Red Envelope Entertainment which it closed in 2008, in part to avoid competition with its studio partners.

My take: Netflix has the market leader’s competitive advantage. What other subscription video on demand (SVOD) platforms do people like, and actually use? Anyone got Shomi or Crave?

Five Tips for the $500 Feature

I recently read Scott McMahon‘s post 5 Tips To Make Your Independent Film More Viable with interest.

He believes that as an indie filmmaker you should:

  1. Do what you love.
  2. Keep it cheap.
  3. Offer value.
  4. Be specific.
  5. Make what Hollywood will not make.

To back up his beliefs, he made a feature for $500 using what he calls Resource Filmmaking.

I followed up with Scott via email:

Why did you want to make ‘THE CUBE’?

“I went to film school, made a lot of awful short films; but one that was half-way decent. Good enough to land a job at Sony PlayStation. I was there for 12 years and ran the Cinematic Department. When that gig ended, I did what any smart person would do when the economy is tanking — make an independent film! After being disillusioned by the traditional way things were being done, I spent the next seven years trying to answer this basic question: ‘If films can be sold online, then how do successful entrepreneurs sell things online?’ I was used to making things in a big playground, spoiled by PlayStation, but I knew there could be a way to make a really small feature film… I just didn’t have a story to tell. Until one day, I did. ‘THE CUBE’ was made because it was a story that I could film and make in my own home and around my full-time job. ‘THE CUBE’ was made for $500 with no crew. It wasn’t planned that way, but my lead actress had a limited window to make the film, so I just redesigned my shot lists to use more static shots than I had originally planned.

A year and a half later, are you in profit?

“I made ‘THE CUBE’ all wrong. It’s a film with no stars, a genre that is not clearly identified, and I built no audience awareness for it. With that said, I knew things would be CHEAP and SLOW. However, I have made money between the theatrical premiere and Electronic Sell Through (EST) sales. So, in a way, you can say I’m a successful filmmaker because I made a film for a set budget and not only made my money back, but made a little profit as well.”

What’s your ROI?

“The easiest way to determine ROI for any über independent filmmaker selling their film directly online is to use the conversion rate of 1%. This means, that if your film gets 1,000 trailer views, then about 1% of viewers will actually pay for your film. 1% of 1,000 views equals 10 sales transactions. 10 x $5 rental price = $50 in sales. You can read more about this 1% conversion rate in a guest blog post I wrote on Ted Hope’s blog. My overall trailer views have been around 5,500. With a 1% conversion rate, I’ve made about 55 sales transactions at around $10 a transaction. That’s about $550 in sales. Adding in the profit made on the local theatrical premiere of about $180, ‘THE CUBE’ has pulled in about $730. Laughable, I know… but it was always designed this way. That’s why I made sure the film was made for so cheap. Now, the cool thing is that I plan on relaunching this film again, with a whole new marketing campaign and targeting an audience who are NOT other filmmakers. I’ll report back on this experiment later in the year to share those results too. The great thing about owning the license to my own IP, I can repackage it, relaunch it, and resell it in anyway I feel will work. So, I still may make more money in the future.”

Do you have another feature in development and what’s the budget?

“‘THE CUBE’ was always designed as a small film for me… and to be used as an experiment to see what works and what doesn’t work when selling a film product online. With my next feature film, I’m trying to apply all the things that should have been done the first time around. This particular film is in the straight up scary movie genre. The budget is targeted at another $500. Why? I’m very keen on trying to get better at making feature films in this budget range and test my storytelling skills as much as possible. I believe one day, someone is going to make a little film for $100 and sell it directly online to an audience and make a million. Remember the iPhone app boom, when a single programmer could make a ‘fart’ app, sell it for $0.99 and make a million? Who’s to say this can’t happen to a filmmaker? Once it does, then the entire indie film industry will turn its head and say, ‘Ok, let’s do it like that.’ Anyway, that’s where my interests lie. When the normal convention is to think that we should up the budget and go bigger… I want to go even smaller.”

What’s the one piece of advice you’d like indie filmmakers to follow?

“From all the work I’ve done over at FilmTrooper.com, where I focus on trying to help filmmakers become entrepreneurs, this is the one thing that stands out for me: Filmmakers should ‘let go’ of their ego and surrender their talents to SERVE a group of people who they have determined to be their IDEAL FANS. Putting yourself in a place where you are SERVING others will give you greater joy and fulfillment… more so than any award can ever give.”

My take: thanks, Scott, for sharing. I also think smaller budgets force filmmakers to come up with creative solutions to challenges, rather than just throwing money at ‘problems.’ A $500 budget certainly enforces some creative discipline — Ingrid Veninger in Toronto raises the bar to $1000.

The Netflix Quantum Theory explained

If you subscribe to Netflix, you’ve likely seen some strange categories suggested for your entertainment:

  • Cult Mockumentaries With a Strong Female Lead
  • Chilling Workplace Mysteries From the 1980s
  • Cerebral Mind-Bending Courtroom Fantasy Movies

While those might not be real categories, Alexis Madrigal and Ian Bogost looked into Netflix’s taxonomy and concluded they have over 75,000 different ones.

They’ve even posted a spreadsheet listing 10 sub-genre columns. The longest one, Adjectives, has almost 150 rows, everything from Absurd to Zombie.

The fascinating tale of their data hunt is detailed in The Atlantic’s How Netflix Reverse Engineered Hollywood.

‘Todd Yellin is Netflix’s VP of Product and the man responsible for the creation of Netflix’s system. Tagging all the movies was his idea…. A fascinating thing I learned from Yellin is that the underlying tagging data isn’t just used to create genres, but also to increase the level of personalization in all the movies a user is shown. So, if Netflix knows you love Action Adventure movies with high romantic ratings (on their 1-5 scale), it might show you that kind of movie, without ever saying, “Romantic Action Adventure Movies.” “We’re gonna tag how much romance is in a movie. We’re not gonna tell you how much romance is in it, but we’re gonna recommend it,” Yellin said. “You’re gonna get an action row and it may have more or less romance in it based on what we know about you.”‘

My take: I love The Atlantic’s Netflix-Genre Generator. There are three flavours: Netflix, Hollywood and Gonzo. Good for lots of chuckles — and maybe some bright ideas too!

Youtube is Ten!

Youtube is ten years old this week.

It’s first video was posted on April 23, 2005, and since then Me at the zoo has been seen more than 22 million times, even though the clip is a mere 18 seconds long.

Remember that in 2005, most people were still using dial-up connections to access the Internet. Yet to come were Twitter, Facebook, smartphones, broadband access and streaming Netflix.

Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim registered youtube.com on February 14, 2005. Twenty-one months later Google bought the site for $1.65 billion in stock.

In 2011 Youtube revealed that 99% of views are generated by 30% of the hosted videos. Today, over 300 hours of video are uploaded every minute.

In fact, Variety reported last year that American teens idolize Youtubers even more than Hollywood celebrities.

My take: Internet video has made incredible strides in the last ten years. I wonder how things will change in the next ten years. Any thoughts?

Is it Crowd-funding or Crowd-finding?

Nathalie Sejean of Mentorless.com recently blogged that We Are All Unique, But We Are Not Special (or Why We Should Stop Asking for Ridiculously High Amount of Money from Potential Backers to Let Them See Our Film).

She argues that:

“Setting $50 as an entry point to see your film in a crowdfunding campaign is neither okay nor a good idea.”

She discusses the Established System and the emerging Neo-System.

In the Established System you needed to convince FINancers that you were the right person to make the project and that it would make a profit.

Whereas, in the Neo-System, you need to convince people to become FANancers.

“In the Neo-System, you don’t need to convince people that you can do the job, they assume you can do it, you just need to convince them your story is worth seeing the light of day. People don’t give money to our projects because they want to make more money (not yet at least). They don’t care if our film  makes big bucks. Honestly, they don’t even care if it hits theatres. In the Neo-System, the first thing backers care about is seeing our film. Within the Neo-System, our story matters more than we do.”

She wants filmmakers to make sure they don’t mistake FANancers as FINancers.

“Why ask for 4 or 5 times what someone would pay at the theater to give them the “privilege” to see our film? By doing that, we are sending the wrong message. We are telling people that they don’t deserve to watch our film unless they can pay what is essentially five months on Netflix. We are telling people that we are special.”

My take: I really like Nathalie’s insights into crowd-funding. The whole article is worth reading.

Why do people do crowd-funding?

Alan Tudyk’s Con Man has set a new crowd-funding record on Kickstarter, raising over $3.1 Million from over 46,000 fans.

But Super Trooper 2 still has nine days to go and has already raised over $3.6 Million from over 39,000 funders.

Trying to make sense of it all?

Elizabeth Gerber and Julie Hui’s “Crowdfunding: Motivations and Deterrents for Participation” is the most scholarly exploration of crowd-funding I’ve seen.

They see Creator Motivations as:

  • Raise Funds
  • Expand Awareness of Work
  • Form Connections
  • Gain Approval
  • Maintain Control
  • Learn New Fundraising Skills

And Creator Deterrents as:

  • Inability to Attract Supporters
  • Fear of Public Failure and Exposure
  • Time and Resource Commitment

Supporter Motivations are:

  • Collect Rewards
  • Help Others
  • Be Part of A Community
  • Support A Cause

Whereas the main Supporter Deterrent is Distrust of Creators’ Use of Funds.

See her article in the Huffington Post and listen to her on NPR’s Marketplace.

My take: although the rewards appear irresistible, crowd-funding is a lot of work so do your research first.

New Crowd-Funding Records in the Works!

Not one, but two film/video/web projects on Indie Go Go are breaking crowd-funding records.

Con Man, by Alan Tudyk and Nathan Fillion, closes this week and has raised over $2.8 Million from over 41,000 supporters.

“Wray Nerely (Alan Tudyk) was a co-star on Spectrum, a sci-fi series which was canceled yet became a cult classic. Wray’s good friend, Jack Moore (Nathan Fillion) starred in the series and has gone on to become a major movie star. While Jack enjoys the life of an A-lister, Wray tours the sci-fi circuit as a guest of conventions, comic book stores, and lots of pop culture events. The show will feature all the weird and crazy things that happen to Wray along the way to these events.”

For $25 funders get to watch the 12 episodes on Vimeo On Demand.

Super Troopers 2, by Broken Lizard, closes in a couple of weeks and so far has raised over $3.4 Million from over 36,000 supporters.

“Howdy. We’re Broken Lizard. Several moons ago, we made a little indie movie called Super Troopers, which we debuted at Sundance in 2001. We’re proud of how it turned out and apparently it struck a chord with many of you out there because almost daily we get asked “Who wants a mustache ride?” (“Who doesn’t?”) or “Did you chug real maple syrup?” (“Yes, and we will never, ever, ever do it again.”) or “How is the view from sugar heaven?” (“Sweet.”) But more than anything else, we get asked:When are you gonna get off your assess and make Super Trooper 2?”

For $30, funders get a digital download of the feature. For $35, funders get a Fandango movie ticket to the (as yet unmade) film plus other perks.

Both projects have surpassed the current record of $2.48 Million set only last July by Lazer Team.

Kickstarter still has a bigger record: $5.7 Million for the Veronica Mars Movie Project.

My take: I think it’s interesting that both of these projects are based on earlier enterprises, if not outright sequels. That’s one way to bring a lot of fans to the bazaar.

Tips for your Indie Film Release

The recent SXSW panel Hacking Technology For Your Indie Film Release asked the question:

“As new technologies and distribution approaches continue to disrupt conventional release windows, funding cycles, and acquisition deals, how do indie filmmakers navigate this shifting landscape while balancing audience engagement and revenue?”

The Sundance Institute‘s #ArtistServices presented and has since released 23 Hacks for your Indie Film Release — “what it takes to get your film seen in an overcrowded marketplace by using technology as your secret weapon.”

Here they are:

  1. Schedule pre-order windows
  2. Avoid December and February releases
  3. Purchase a specific E&O policy that fits your film release plans
  4. Don’t limit your theatrical screenings to only Art House Theatres
  5. Upload final DCP-formatted trailers on Dropbox or G Drive
  6. Do NOT purchase KDMs
  7. $250 vs 35% — what you charge exhibitors
  8. Beware the “Virtual Print Fee”
  9. All screenings are “theatrical”
  10. Be frugal when printing one-sheets
  11. Small Size Matters Too: consider the thumbnail
  12. Don’t worry about print ads
  13. Harness internet trends
  14. Email subject lines matter
  15. Tweet at people who just tweeted
  16. Email lists are still the gold
  17. Upload content natively to each social platform
  18. Better Bundle for Bigger Bucks
  19. Private Vimeo Screeners
  20. Growth hack your backer rewards
  21. Carve out rights to do traditional digital and direct-to-fan deals on your own
  22. Ask distributors about their digital economics
  23. Pay for a quality closed caption file

Read the article for full details.

My take: as you fashion your digital distribution strategy, keep these ideas in mind.

Two crowd-producing platforms: Storyhive and CineCoup

Funders are turning to the crowd to help green light their projects.

Storyhive, Telus Optik TV’s web series venture in BC and Alberta, has already listened to the crowd to fund a first round of 29 semi-finalists to shoot their pilots. Voting concludes tomorrow, March 26, 2015, for a further $50,000 for two teams to produce five more episodes.

Cinecoup‘s 74 hopefuls have posted their trailers online and now await the crowd to begin voting on April 6, 2015. By mid-June, one project will advance to win $1,000,000 to shoot a feature film.

In both cases, teams have worked hard to advance their projects. Storyhive was free to enter (although required residence in certain cities) with a two-minute pitch video. Semi-finalists were awarded $10,000 to make their first webisodes. On the other hand, Cinecoup cost up to $120 to enter, with a one-minute trailer. Teams agree to tackle a series of up to a dozen (unpaid) missions while the crowd votes projects through a series of gateways: Top 60, Top 30, Top 15 and the Final 5. In both cases, juries make the final decisions.

My take: please check out these sites! My kudos to the participants for investing so much of their time and energy into their projects — and it’s a lot of work! — work that supports two ‘contest’ platforms in exchange for the promise of future rewards. I personally don’t think that either platform has solved the website versus television design question yet — video galleries on static pages versus the single video focus of TV. Channels and up-down, left-right grids may be the best solutions for now.