Snapchat: live, stock and hype

Today, to millennials, many new media celebrities are bigger than old media celebrities.

So what do you do when you have over 2.5 million Youtube subscribers?

If you’re Andrea Russett you partner with Indigenous Media and make a horror feature over five days using Snapchat, in 10 second ‘broadcasts’.

The story concerns the hunted Sickhouse, its urban legends, Russett and her friends — invoking a nod to The Blair Witch Project, one of the first word-of-mouth found footage success stories and the most successful one by box office.

Then, in true Snapchat fashion, the clips started disappearing from view 24 hours after being posted.

Don’t dispair, though. The director’s cut will be available for everyone on Vimeo on June 2. You can pre-order now.

Read more here.

My take: this is another example of ‘the medium is the message’ —  a creative exploration of Snapchat’s technological limitations by a Youtuber leveraging her online fans to create something potentially lucrative. The Tribeca Film Festival even had a 200 second Tribeca Snapchat Stories competition this year. What I think is revolutionary about the Sickhouse project is that it launched into the world as a ‘live’ five-day experience for Russet’s followers first, before being packaged into a traditional (playback only) movie format. (If they keep the vertical video format, they’ve definitely decided their target audience is strictly mobile.)

Portrait mode video lures advertisers

Even though a mock Vertical Video Syndrome PSA first appeared in 2012, it seems as if portrait mode video is making a big splash.

According to Snapchat (as quoted in Long Considered an Eyesore, Vertical Video Is Now Being Embraced by Mobile Marketers on Entrepreneur),

“Vertical video ads are nine times more likely to be viewed to completion than their horizontal counterparts.”

There’s even a platform dedicated exclusively to vertical videos. Vervid plans to become the Youtube for “thoughtful content” shot in upright mode on iPhones. They write on Medium:

“We hold our phones vertically 90% of the time. Thanks to Snapchat and now Meerkat and Periscope, this behavior is becoming even more normalized as more and more content is being shot natively in portrait mode. So rather than having to constantly switch between how we naturally hold our phones (vertically) to the way most media has traditionally been formatted (horizontally), users are now able to enjoy content the way they’ve secretly always wanted to — upright, up close and personal.”

My take: even though purists might decry this state of affairs, I think it’s only a natural evolution. Consider that over 50% of Youtube views now come from mobile. Those mobile viewers will gladly watch in portrait orientation, saving themselves the time to rotate their phones horizontally. And though almost all movies are shot using horizontal aspect ratios, Xavier Dolan went 1:1 for Mommy!

The mediascape begins tipping as internet subscribers outnumber cable TV subscribers

Digiday reports that Network TV is now appealing to potential viewers on Facebook:

“‘Right now, the world of video content distribution is right on the edge of total chaos,’ said James Nail, a principal analyst at Forrester Research. Previously, if a network had a new show to promote, it would use a couple minutes of commercial time during the nightly broadcast. That’s not enough anymore.”

No wonder: video on Facebook has exploded.

Couple that with the fact that online viewing now surpasses cable TV watching.

According to Bloomberg Business:

“Concerns about the growing number of consumers who drop TV packages and watch programs on services offered by Netflix or Amazon.com Inc. led to a sell-off in media stocks in August, with entertainment companies losing more than $60 billion in value over two days.”

My take: it’s all about building an audience. Go to where the eyeballs are. For more and more folks, that’s their smart phones, not their TVs.

The decline of the web series

James Rawson writes in The Guardian that the web series is dying.

After recapping the successes of 2013 he laments:

“This year has seen no exciting steps forward for the medium, no breakthrough talents that have taken the web by storm, and no moneyed producers are making serious investments in the previously hyped new format. Apart from a few established talents and series that have managed to sustain themselves with a hard-won fan base, everyone else seems to have packed their bags and gone home.”

The reason why? The rise of Pro Streamers:

“With the rising popularity of Netflix and Amazon Prime, the distinction between online viewing and television has disappeared. Three years ago, if you were filming a drama to be streamed online, it’s likely that your main competition was going to be a home video of a cat with a French voiceover. Now, it’s Kevin Spacey in House of Cards, or a rebooted Arrested Development. The idea that low production values or a slightly unpolished script will be forgiven because a show is online no longer holds any sway. Combine that with the fact that advertising revenue simply isn’t reliable enough to guarantee creators will break even on their series, never mind make a profit, and the format seems increasingly unattractive.”

My take: On one hand, I was going to say, “The thing about the Internet is that it’s a huge desert and it can take hard work to find content that truly speaks to you. Pro Streamers and other content curators are building sustaining oases in that desert and operating lively bazaars there. They’re building markets. As an indie filmmaker, it’s very difficult or almost impossible to create that network effort by yourself.” On the other hand, yes, it’s tough and the competition is fierce. But never before have we had so many tools at hand. Have faith, work hard and believe the cream always rises to the top. Confession: I’d heard vaguely of The Guild but didn’t seek it out and watch it until I found it on Netflix.

 

 

Choicebook wants your opinion

Is a survey still a survey if you call it something else?

The CRTC wants your opinion about TV in Canada. Will you pay more? Do you want the Internet regulated?

Visit Choicebook to have your say.

“Canadians like to watch television and for many of them, the way they do so is changing. More and more people are watching their favourite shows on their cable or satellite company’s on-demand service, over the Internet and on tablets and smartphones. The way Canadians think about—and even interact with—television is clearly not the same today as it was just a few years ago. At the CRTC, we want to make sure that the television system meets the needs of Canadians – as citizens, creators and consumers. We understand that the system has to adapt to remain healthy, continue to offer different kinds of programming and be responsive to Canadians’ expectations over the coming years.”

But do it soon. Choicebook closes on March 14, 2014.

My take: it’s in your best interest to invest the time to let the CRTC know what you’re thinking.