Make your logline your pitch!

Franklin Leonard followed up his recent post with “The Moral Case for ‘Selling Out’ 2“.

He begins:

“A lot of people are confusing “logline” with “pitch.” That confusion is definitely costing you reads. PLOT ≠ PITCH. Something you all need to know: Nobody cares about your logline. Even when they ask for your logline, they don’t want your logline. What they want is your pitch. And a pitch is called a pitch because it’s a sales pitch. If your logline functions like a pitch, congratulations: you’ve accidentally done it right. If it reads like a synopsis, it’s dead weight.”

He wants your pitch to make people curious: “In its optimal form, a pitch is the fewest words that create a small, sharp void in someone’s mind that they feel a desperate need to fill.”

He follows up with a list of four logline/pitch templates, with great examples:

  • The What If (aka The Act One) A single disruption that instantly forces the question, “Okay, well, then what happens?”
  • Central Conflict + (Venue and/or Stakes) Two clear forces collide in a specific place and with specific consequences you can feel.
  • Everything Old is New Again A recognizable commercial engine, but with a protagonist swap that changes the moral temperature of the movie.
  • “A meets B” (but only under very specific conditions) Two movies with seemingly opposing values or tones slammed together in a way that creates tension that the audience wants to resolve.

Compare these with the logline formula Michael Anthony taught me:

When an [adjective*] [character] wants an [objective] they must overcome some [obstacle or inciting incident] — but can they succeed or face a [consequence]? (*adjective should be the quality that is tested/changes as a result of the story.)

Michael’s form tends to help you break the story whereas Franklin’s might elicit more curiosity. (Truth be told, Michael’s formula is basically Franklin’s What If model.)

My Take: always be closing! I think realizing your logline needs to pitch your project more than explain the plot actually makes it easier to create.

Can the Ethos Equity Model Finance Indie Films?

Jason Hellerman of No Film School interviews Ariel Heller and Sam Baron about financing in How ‘Circles’ Is Using Radical Transparency and an Equity Model to Build an Indie Feature.

Jason quotes Ariel:

“In the traditional finance model, indies rely on underpaid labor, opaque accounting, and the promise of exposure that rarely materializes into real participation. Whereas in this equity model, everyone from director to PA works for the same rate (a competitive indie wage pegged to the SAG minimums) in exchange for equity. Most crews never see a budget, never understand a waterfall, and never receive a dollar after wrap. By opening the books, educating collaborators on the model itself and giving access to budgets and cap tables, we remove the suspicion that has defined so much of the industry. Transparency builds confidence, and confidence builds better work.”

Their inspiration comes from Clint Bentley and Greg Kwedar. See their Ethos Equity Financing Model.

See Wrapbook to understand traditional Equity Financing.

My take: I like the thought behind this. Using “set time” to determine equity gets everyone in the game, however, it also devalues intangibles like a screenwriter’s years of rewrites, a cinematographer’s film school debt and an actor’s clout. To make this work, I think you’d have to assign in-kind value to these and other intangibles and add this to the Investor side. Then 60/40 to 120%, followed by 50/50 could make sense. Basically, this model has craftspeople in front of and behind the camera share 40% of all income from the first dollar, distributed by time worked, hopefully rising to 50% at some point.

 

Write a commercial spec script, please!

Franklin Leonard of The Black List makes The Moral Case for “Selling Out”.

Read the full post because it’s guaranteed to get your fired up for 2026. Leonard starts with:

“If you’re an aspiring professional screenwriter and you want this to be your job, write a commercial spec script.”

By commercial, he means something real audiences will pay to watch.

He then goes on to ask nine questions you must answer before you spend your limited time and energy on a script:

  • Can you make a busy person want to read it in a single sentence?
  • Is it in a genre lane with an engine?
  • Does your protagonist want something visible and external?
  • Do you have a “big bad?”
  • Do you have a ticking clock?
  • Do the stakes escalate?
  • Do you have set pieces?
  • Do you land the plane?
  • Is it yours?

He concludes with this exhortation:

“Earnest as it may be, I still believe that a popular movie, done right, is a small act of care at a global scale. Look around. The world out there is rough right now for almost everyone. If you can help people set down whatever they’re carrying for two hours and, as Miyazaki puts it, “find unexpected admiration, honesty, or affirmation in themselves, and… return to their daily lives with a bit more energy,” there’s absolutely nothing soulless or frivolous about that.”

My take: I agree log lines are very important. Roger Corman would start with the poster. In both cases, they represent the concept of your story: the sum of character, plot, setting, conflict, and theme. This is the DNA of the work — choose carefully.

Your 2026 Roadmap to Success

Ah! It’s a new year! 2026! How to not only survive, but to thrive? You need a plan.

Elliot Grove of Raindance offers 7 Ways Writers, Directors, Actors & Producers Can Actually Survive 2026.

You should read his post yourself but here’s the TLDR:

  1. Build an Audience Before You Need One
  2. Create Assets, Not Single Projects
  3. Use AI as a Lever — Not a Crutch or a Threat
  4. Diversify Your Income Into Three Lanes
  5. Work in Public — and Make Repetition Your Religion
  6. Build Collaborative Triangles — Not Industry Contacts
  7. Develop the 7 Soft Skills That Will Matter More Than Talent

He concludes with this:

“The Good News: 2026 Favors the Brave

  • Yes, the industry is shifting.
  • Yes, synthetic performers exist.
  • Yes, freelancers are absorbing the shocks.
  • Yes, budgets are a rollercoaster.

But there has never been a better time to be an independent filmmaker.

  • Never easier to reach audiences.
  • Never easier to build IP.
  • Never easier to experiment.
  • Never easier to collaborate globally.
  • Never easier to launch a career without asking permission.”

My take: if you want a roadmap to success in these turbulent times, Elliot’s advice is very much worth considering. Bonne chance!

 

Writers: give and get feedback for free

StoryPeer.com is a new platform developed by Gabriel Dimilo to help writers get free feedback on their work by giving feedback on other writers’ works anonymously.

Nathan Graham Davis summarized the new site succinctly in this video.

The platform uses tokens to facilitate reviews: offer them to other writers to give notes and hence earn them by reviewing work.

Everyone starts off with seven tokens.

Readers will pick your project based on its title, logline, genre, and length. And how many tokens you offer. A rule of thumb I suggest is to offer one token for every 30 pages.

My take: beware, this can become addictive! I’ve already reviewed two features and received notes on one of my shorts.

Hallmark movies exposed!

Stephen Follows and Walt Hickey pull the curtain back on a staple at this time of year: the Hallmark Movie.

Stephen actually quotes from the Hallmark Playbook!

Requirements like:

  • A strong female lead (early to mid-thirties).
  • Lean into the holiday/give leads a POV about the holiday (this is especially the case for Christmas. We like a lot of holiday traditional elements and, more importantly, to give our leads a strong point of view of the holiday).
  • Script should be 105-110 pages typically.
  • 9 Act Structure.
  • Act 1 is 23-25 pages.
  • The other acts are shorter but should be generally consistent — 8-12 pages usually.
  • Midpoint is at the middle of Act 4.
  • Acts 7/8 needs to be the low point/breaking point before things get better.
  • Act 9 is often 7-10 pages.
  • Total runtime we aim for is 86:30 and then after we screen the producer’s cut internally, we will typically take it down to 84:00 (with credits).
  • We’re generally not fans of montages or slow motion.
  • We don’t do cursing, dirty jokes, innuendos, etc.
  • Our content is not sexual in nature at all (a kiss is enough to show the romance in our movies), and we usually save this moment for the end when our lead gets her fairytale ending.
  • We don’t like karaoke or singing scenes in our movies and no bowling.

Vancouver Magazine explains How Hallmark Movies Get Made in BC.

This uncredited post exposes the typical Hallmark Movie plot structure:

  1. The Intro! Someone (usually a woman) is leading a happy life.
  2. The Complication! requiring the lead character to travel somewhere (home, small town, the big city).
  3. The Chance Encounter! with the soon-to-be romantic interest, usually with negative or neutral/ambivalent, at best, feelings. This is often an ex/long-lost first love. Sometimes, it’s a family friend, sister’s groom’s best man, etc.
  4. The Challenge! The situation gets more challenging and, somehow, the romantic interest is always just there, resulting in many more encounters where the interest makes himself helpful, at the initial chagrin of the lead character who begrudgingly accepts the situation.
  5. The Warm-up! Additional encounters between lead character and romantic interest result in a warming up of the relationship and they begin to enjoy spending time together. This is also where they gaze into each others’ eyes (because they dropped something and both bent down to pick it up) before one of them says awkwardly, “I should go…” or something to that effect.
  6. The Near Kiss! They finally get over that hump, find themselves outside, and get interrupted just at the last moment before their lips meet.
  7. The Misunderstanding! Lead or romantic interest overhears part of a conversation or observes some romantic-looking situation and thinks, “Oh, this was never going to work out anyway, I should just go back home and give up on my newly-realized dream of love and happiness.” Often, this happens because the one or both are afraid to or unsure of how to express themselves.
  8. The Reconciliation! Someone musters up the courage to tell the other how they feel or to say sorry or to say they understand if they want to be with the other person — thanks to a parent, friend, mentor, confidant who puts them on the right track and helps them see things for what they really are. Forgiveness happens and the feelings are requited!
  9. The Happy Ending! They agree to spend their days and years together with the farm or inn or shop or restaurant or lodge, kiss, maybe a closing scene surrounded by friends/family, and le fin.

My take: is it sacrilege to admit that I’ve never seen one? Well, maybe only one — that my friend acted in. Happy Holidays everyone!

 

Database of Canadian Feature Films

Do you own the rights to a Canadian feature film? If so, you should add it to the new Canadian Movie Database.

Created by the Network of Independent Canadian Exhibitors (NICE), the database powers a new B2B platform that connects Canadian independent cinemas with film distributors or rights holders, offering curated films by genre or theme.

This new digital marketplace is vital for the expanding ecosystem of independent Canadian film exhibition, providing access to more topical content to the film-going community.

My take: finally a way for all those movies made in Canada to appeal directly to Canadian cinemas and hence to Canadian viewers. You’ve made a feature, did the festival circuit and came this close to a distribution deal. Now you can post your film on this database and reach out to appropriate screens directly. Of course, your chances of getting a booking increase if you give the theatre a great reason to book: the theme of your film is suddenly topical, one of your actors breaks big, your genre film matches the calendar (think Valentines, Halloween, Christmas, etc.) Or you band together with other local filmmakers and offer “The Victoria New Wave” package of movies, for instance. The Canadian Movie Database is a great way to get Canadian films in front of Canadian audiences.

The new age of cinema begins

Dana Harris-Bridson reports in IndieWire on Creator Camp and the Three-Picture Theatrical Deal: Attend Is Betting the Internet Can Fill Movie Screens.

She writes, “The Austin-based creator collective distribution arm, Camp Studios, signed a three-picture theatrical deal with Attend Theatrical Marketplace, the Fithian Group company that connects filmmakers directly with movie theaters, streamlining the process of booking and releasing films.”

“The real bet is if creators already know their audience, why can’t that audience show up to a cinema?”

The first test is indie rom-com Two Sleepy People.

My take: I’ve been waiting for this moment for twenty years, ever since video first started appearing on the Internet.

This is much more than a story about a distributor picking up a movie for distribution; it’s tentative proof of a new and emerging theatrical distribution model that will replace the crumbling one.

The big difference to me is the importance of Audience. In the Legacy Model, it was simply assumed that the audience would show up if enough money was spent on marketing. In the New Model, online creators have ongoing relationships with their audiences before making their movies and then rely on them to manifest local screenings on demand through critical mass.

In simple terms:

OLD = Legacy Creator -> Movie -> Distributor -> Cinemas -> Audience.

NEW = Online Creator -> Audience -> Movie -> Distributor -> Audience -> Cinemas.

Best wishes to Attend and Creator Camp!

When is a Film a Movie?

Stephen Follows asks the question, “Which types of features films are called ‘films’, and which are called ‘movies’?

His analysis reveals that audiences tend to call all films movies, with Action, Adventure and Sci-Fi genres the most likely to be “movies.”

Whereas, audiences only tend to call War, History and Biography genres “films,” with all others more likely to be “movies.”

His conclusion:

“We could say that the more fun a genre appears to be, the greater chance it has to be a movie.”

My take: no real surprise here; audiences want to be entertained. A good story, well told. Another consideration is that almost no-one actually films on film anymore.

Rio and friends step up to save Vancouver’s Park Theatre

Part of Vancouver’s film history has been saved by Corinne Lea of the Rio Theatre and a group of private investors, reports The Hollywood Reporter.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Corinne Lea (@corinne_riotheatre)

From her statement:

“The Rio Theatre is very excited by the opportunity to revive Vancouver’s historic, art-deco Park Theatre in the beloved Cambie Village neighbourhood. We are grateful for the support of this impressive group of film industry professionals, and could not do this without them! After almost two decades of rocking the Rio, we look forward to this expansion, and bringing the same fun, energy and passion to a new location.”

Among the investors are:

  1. Chris Ferguson
  2. Osgood Perkins
  3. Mike Flanagan
  4. Sean Baker
  5. Samantha Quan
  6. Zach Lipovsky
  7. Finn Wolfhard
  8. Graham Fortin
  9. Eugenio Battaglia
  10. Andy Levine
  11. Jill Orsten
  12. Christina Bulbrook

My take: I applaud this effort because local control of movie screens is critical for a truly independent national cinema.